Join now
Log In
SEARCH
About us
What we do
Staff
Council
Jobs
Join & support
What’s on
Library
RSL Review Magazine
Research
The Literature Matters Hub
RSL Fellows
RSL Open
Outreach
Awards & Prizes
News
Contact
MENU
About us
What we do
Staff
Council
Jobs
Join & support
What’s on
Library
RSL Review Magazine
Research
The Literature Matters Hub
RSL Fellows
RSL Open
Outreach
Awards & Prizes
News
Contact
Join now
Log In
Home
>
RSL 2022 in Review – Team Feedback
RSL 2022 in Review – Team Feedback
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
This review is intended to:
•
Clarify what we sought to achieve over the course of the year;
• Provide an opportunity for team members to review the successes of the year, and the challenges that arose;
• Review the processes by which we managed our working, within our specific areas of activity and overall (particularly highlighting where these were effective or did not achieve the aims);
• Aid in planning for the future, particularly by identifying the areas in internal communications where the greatest strain was felt.
Each team member is being asked to give feedback on the organisation’s work over the year.
This is an opportunity to reflect on what has worked in the activities you focus on, and where there have been challenges or limitations. It’s also a chance to think about the wider working of the organisation – as a small team we’ll all see areas of work that can be improved to the benefit of all that we do. In your feedback you should feel comfortable to identify where things have gone well beyond the scope of your specific role, and where we can learn from issues that have arisen.
Review of your work will be conducted with your manager as part of our appraisal process, separately to this review of the organisation’s work over the last year.
What was the RSL trying to accomplish over the last year? What were our objectives?
These should be for the organisation overall but you can focus on your specific areas of work.
Where did we hit our objectives?
What went well with the programmes you work on? What successes did we have in those areas?
Where did we miss our objectives?
What didn't go well with the programmes you work on? What challenges did we have in those areas?
What could have gone better, in your areas of work and for the organisation overall?
What caused our positive results?
What led to things going well?
What compromised us in achieving our targets?
Were there challenges we’ve faced before? What were the unforeseen challenges we faced? Can we plan for them in the future? Were there extenuating factors and if there were can we do anything in the future to mitigate against them?
What should we start, stop, or continue doing?
After thinking of what went well and what could have gone better, what should we do next, now that we know what we know? Are there areas we need to focus on more in the future? How does this work for the wider organisation, and for your individual role?
How have we met our overall aims this year?
1
2
3
4
5
Being a responsible and effective organisation
1
Being a responsible and effective organisation 1
2
Being a responsible and effective organisation 2
3
Being a responsible and effective organisation 3
4
Being a responsible and effective organisation 4
5
Being a responsible and effective organisation 5
Acting as a voice for the value of literature
1
Acting as a voice for the value of literature 1
2
Acting as a voice for the value of literature 2
3
Acting as a voice for the value of literature 3
4
Acting as a voice for the value of literature 4
5
Acting as a voice for the value of literature 5
Engaging people in great literature
1
Engaging people in great literature 1
2
Engaging people in great literature 2
3
Engaging people in great literature 3
4
Engaging people in great literature 4
5
Engaging people in great literature 5
Honouring and encouraging great writers
1
Honouring and encouraging great writers 1
2
Honouring and encouraging great writers 2
3
Honouring and encouraging great writers 3
4
Honouring and encouraging great writers 4
5
Honouring and encouraging great writers 5
Where 1 means poor performance and 5 means excellent performance
Is there anything you'd like to add to the ratings you've given our performance for the year?
Is there anything else you'd like to share in your review of the year, or any feedback for the wider team?
Submit